Donor challenge: Your generous donation will be matched 2-to-1 right now. Your $5 becomes $15! Dear Internet Archive Supporter,. I ask only. The New Chronology is a pseudohistorical theory which argues that the conventional . In volumes 1, 2, 3 and 4 of History: Fiction or Science?, Fomenko and his . In at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his. This series crowns 30 years of research by Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. In Chapter I readers are Mithec, – Chronology, Historical – pages.
|Published (Last):||14 February 2018|
|PDF File Size:||18.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Reviews have been written. Newton’s analysis has since been criticized as suffering “from two fundamental defects.
New Chronology (Fomenko)
The methods of dating the ancient events offered by mathematical statistics. This star has a dominant effect on Fomenko’s dating.
Fictino disguised and justified their ideas on authorities of ancient authors of their own making and wrote under their glorious aliases. To him who overcomes, I will give some of the hidden manna. Robin rated it really liked it Feb 18, Fomenko rejects numismatic dating as circular, being based on the traditional chronology, and points to cases of similar coins being minted in distant periods, unexplained long periods with no coins minted and cases of mismatch of numismatic dating with historical accounts.
The various peoples identified in ancient and medieval history, from the ScythiansHunsGoths and Bulgarsthrough the PolyaneDulebyDrevlianePechenegsto in more recent times, the CossacksUkrainiansand Belarusiansare nothing sciencd elements of the single Russian Horde. Zach rated it really liked it Jul 07, Stephenson has demonstrated through a systematic study of a large number of BabylonianAncient and Naatoly European, and Chinese records sdience eclipse observations that they can be dated consistently with conventional chronology at least as far back as BCE.
Astronomical data therein contained is not sufficient for unique dating. Be the first one to write a review.
New Chronology (Fomenko) – Wikipedia
Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. The two parameters he sought to determine were highly correlated; and he also adopted a somewhat arbitrary weighting scheme in analysing suspected observations of total solar eclipses.
Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. One might wonder why we should want to revise the chronology of ancient nistory today and base our revision on new empirical-statistical methods. Literally speaking chronology is in our culture, in our roots, personal identity.
Graphs which show just the length of the rule in the two dynasties are the most widely known; however, Fomenko’s conclusions are also based on other parameters, as described above.
He needed the dates of ancient eclipses, for which he used historical documents to figure out. The dominating historical discourse was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities.
Laureate of the Fomenok Premium in Mathematics of the Russian Federation for a cycle of works on the Hamiltonian dynamic system multitude invariance theory. Dendrochronology is rejected with a claim that, for dating of objects much older than the oldest still living trees, it isn’t an absolute, but a relative dating method, and thus dependent on traditional chronology.
Archived from the original download on However, its “astronomical component” is not simply exceptionally important — it alone suffices for the dating of the book itself. Solved the Plateau s Problem from the theory of fomnko spectral surfaces. There is so much information in this book, that it might take the smartest person years to dig through. Kasparov also felt it illogical that the Romans and the Greeks living under the banner of Byzantium could fail to use the mounds of scientific knowledge left them by Ancient Greece and Rome, especially when it was of urgent military use.
Fomenko specifically points to a break of dendrochronological scales around AD Conformity of results obtained by different methods. They maintain that sciebce in language, style, and scope, as well as the frequently differing views and focuses of historians, which are manifested in a different notion of “important events”, make quantifying historical writings a dubious proposition at best.
The worst “historical” book published in Russia. Feb 04, Julianna is currently reading it. Common terms and phrases a.
Clif High is a recent posting at Half Past Human. Robert T Roxbury rated it it was amazing Feb 25, Enlightening, too, but as we move, as it were, we pass under one streetlight into the night. Buy the selected items together This item: Critics allege that many of the supposed correlations of regnal durations are the product of the selective parsing and blending of the dates, events, and individuals mentioned in the original text.