Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture Type: Chapter; Author(s): Louis Montrose; Date: ; Page start: ; Page end: ; Web. Louis Adrian Montrose is an American literary theorist and academic scholar. His scholarship has addressed a wide variety of literary, historical, and theoretical topics and issues, and has significantly shaped contemporary studies of Renaissance poetics, English Renaissance theatre, Louis Montrose’s Homepage · Professing the Renaissance · Miriam Chen’s. Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture. Louis A. Montrose. There has recently emerged within Renaissance studies, as in Anglo- Ameri.

Author: Mataur Vishicage
Country: Saint Lucia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 21 November 2009
Pages: 444
PDF File Size: 8.59 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.60 Mb
ISBN: 202-3-26137-945-3
Downloads: 17948
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gulabar

So what is the point of searching and describing these poetics in the first place? However, it must be said that given that it is only part of the book, thus it cannot be held fully representative for it.

Louis Montrose – Wikipedia

Although this thesis will not be able to go into detail as to what the theoretical foundations of that shared methodology may be, it will through close reading of these several introductory texts try to come to a certain set of key assumptions about the practice of the New Historicism, which relate to the four aspects Abrams defined as being crucial to poetics. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. Nonetheless, the poetical tenet with regard to the author as voiced above can be regarded as part of the shared methodology: While Montrose claims not to psychoanalyze, he does so anyway.

Characteristic distinctions between renaiszance and history are sidelined. I mean to suggest a process of subjectification that, on the one hand, shapes individuals as loci of consciousness and initiators of action, endows them with subjectivity; and that, on the other hand, positions, motivates, and montrlse them within – subjects them to – social networks and cultural codes that exceed their comprehension or control.

While every New Historicist discussed previously seemed to resonate, be it rrnaissance or not, that the author needs to be seen in both synchronic and diachronic light, there is hardly a trace of a diachronic approach towards the author in the three practical cases of Montrose.


The job of the translator-critic – our job – is to produce this point of departure. It thus makes it hard to spot the difference between a synchronic and diachronic approach of the scholar towards a literary text and its relationship with reality.

That is to say that there is no study or survey that has collected a vast set of ideas, poetics, which define the practice that we today call the New Historicism. University of Chicago Press, Rather, they should and will be called theoretical poetic tenets of the New Historicism: The historical figure of the author is reconfigured by the contemporary critic: The label of New Historicism will sound familiar to most students of literature.

I too felt a desire to speak renaissancw the dead and learned that the New Historicism might louus the key to doing so. While this thesis in itself is not an actual New Historicist analysis but rather montrosf reflection on the practice of the New Historicism, it shall start with an anecdote nonetheless.

Oxford University Press, In a statement made in a lecture at Ghent University in so informs prof. The excerpt here is one that illustrates the synchronic autonomy of the text against culture: I will elaborate on this issue later in the course of this thesis. Neither is this the case in his b or his texts: It has transmuted all that raw facticity into soul and form. However, the work needed in order to fully excavate these poetics could not be undertaken in the span of a thesis. The possibilities for action are always socially and historically situated, always limited and limiting.

Louis Montrose

A lot more texts would need to be considered and studied to fully produce a poetics of this literary practice and more case studies are needed to definitively prove the discontinuity between practice and theory that surfaced here. Viewing literature as on par with other types of texts, the privileging of literature or its composition over and above other social practices is rejected.

Skip to main content. Speaking With the Dead: While this seems like an obvious part of literary criticism, it remains mainly undefined in all seven texts. Edinburgh University Press, While I was on Erasmus in Cardiff during the second semester of this academic year, I was always welcome in his office with any questions and he never ceased to be friendly and helpful, even if he had little time.


New historicism challenged this model’s a priori distinction between internal and external domains, pressing for an integral and also a generative relationship between text and context, and between form and content, in this way grafting a core thesis of the formalist paradigm onto traditional historical scholarship. Surely something must be important about him, as Veeser The first question that thus needs to be asked is what is the reader, in terms of the New Historicism?

When considering the last given quote, about the politics of the practice emerging through the analysis of the New Historicist, and assuming that this has a direct relation to this issue, there is however plenty evidence in the other texts: And such, or in this form, history can be known by us.

This would not have been possible without his help and I am very grateful for it. If, on the other hand, this is a cultural reference, then Montrose cannot be said to be diachronic in the analyses that are studied here.

Louis Montrose | Literary Theory and Criticism

proffssing However, this is by far the most we hear from Louis Montrose: Cornell University Press, The work is not that of one genius, it is part of a community and culture which precedes the author in his writing.

Pieters was always ready for me with helpful commentary and useful suggestions on what to improve and continually pushed me to improve my work.

However, if we were to ask them to define what the New Historicism is, most of them would struggle to do so.

The following quote illustrates this returning idea: Authority, Gender and Representation.

In his survey fromH. Nevertheless, the four tenets founded a basis for further work in exploration of the poetics of the New Historicism.

Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition.